Arbitraje comercial internacional: Algunas cuestiones practicas basadas en el Derecho australiano y colombiano
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/0124-0021/dialogos.58.2023.10442Palabras clave:
Arbitraje comercial internacional, contratación, litigio, leyes aplicables, Ley que rige el convenio arbitral, Alcance del convenio arbitral, suspensión del procedimiento, Validez de la cláusula compromisoria, InoponibilidadResumen
This article aims to explore some of the main aspects and practical problems to have in mind when readers are getting familiar with international commercial arbitration. The text does not pretend to be a profound analysis of the international commercial arbitration institutions, but to review some of the main topics to take into account to begin studying this settlement dispute
system Este artículo tiene como objetivo explorar algunos de los principales aspectos y problemas prácticos a tener en cuenta cuando los lectores se están familiarizando con el arbitraje comercial internacional. El texto no pretende ser un análisis profundo de las instituciones de arbitraje comercial internacional, sino una revisión de los principales temas a tener en cuenta
para comenzar a estudiar este método de resolución de conflictos
Descargas
Referencias
Mr Justice Kerr, “International Arbitration v Litigation”, Journal of business law, 1980, p 164.
The Angelic Grace [1995] 1 Lloyd´s Rep 87, Court of Appeals, May 16 and 17, 1994
Comandate Marine Corp v Panaustralia Shipping Pty Ltd [2006] FCAFC 192
Compagne Tunisienne v Compagne DÁrmement Maritime [1974] AC 572 House of the Lords
Akai Pty Limited V The People's Insurance Company Limited, (1996) 188 Clr 418, High Court
Of Australia, 23 December 1996
Deutsche Schachtbau v Shell [1990] 1 AC 295, 310
James Miller & Partners v Whitworth Street Estates [1970] (Manchester) LTD, AC 583 Hose of the Lords
Naviera Amazónica Peruana S.A v Compañía Internacional de Seguros del Perú [1988] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 116 Court Of Appeal.
Recyclers of Australia Pty Ltd v Hettinga Equipment Inc. [2000] FCA 547 (30 May 2000)
BHPB Freight v Cosco [2008] FCA 551
Commonwealth Coating corps v Continental Casuality Co. 393 US 145 (1968)
Transmarine Seaways corp. of Monrovia v Marc Rich & Co. 480 F Supp 352 (1979)
Gas & Fuel Corp Victoria v Wood Hall & Leonard [1978] VR 385 Supreme Court of Victoria
Noble China Inc. V Cheong [1998] Ont CJ Lexis 2030 Ontario Court of Justice
Uganda Telcom Ltd v Airtel Uganda Ltd (Miscellaneous Application 30 of 2011) [2011] UGCommC 57
Quintette Coal Limited v Nippon Steel Corporation and others [1993] 18 Ybk Com Arb 159 British Columbia Court of Appeal
Laws
International Arbitration Act 1974 (CTH) Australia
The 1563 of 2012 law on national and international arbitration (Colombia)
Law Journals
A Redfern & M Hunter, “The Law and Practice of international Commercial Arbitration” (2nd ed.
L. Newman, “A Practitioner´s Observations On the Resolution of International Commercial
Disputes” (1992) 3 American Review of International Arbitration, p 83
International instruments
UNICITRAL Model Law on international Arbitration (As adopted by the United Nations
Commission on International Trade Law on 21 june 1985, and amended by the United Nations
Commission on international trade Law on 7 July 2006). This model law was adopted in Australia by the International Commercial Arbitration Act and to Colombia in the 1563 of 2012
law.
United Nations Conference on International Commercial Arbitration Convention on the recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (The New York Convention
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Diálogos de saberes
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
