Peripheral Corroboration and Its Compatibility with The Principle of Equality in The Colombian Criminal Process

Abstract

The document addresses the issue of peripheral corroboration in the Colombian criminal system, specifically focusing on its application in cases of sexual crimes. It is highlighted that peripheral corroboration, introduced through jurisprudence, seeks to support the credibility of the victim's version by analyzing the events from a broader context. However, concerns are raised about whether this technique affects fairness for defendants by reducing the margin of reasonable doubt and favoring the victim's version. The objectives of the study are to determine whether the application of peripheral corroboration implies unfair treatment for the defendant and to evaluate whether it affects the objectivity of the judge when evaluating the evidence. The research adopts a qualitative approach and is based on a critical analysis of Colombian jurisprudence and other relevant sources. The investigation uses a method that focuses on understanding things deeply and is based on a careful look at the laws and other sources of Colombia.