Is the cerebroplacental index a predictor of adverse perinatal events in low-risk pregnancies? We estimate the prevalence in a third level hospital in Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/2390-0512/biociencias.2.9654Keywords:
Cerebro-placental ratio, adverse perinatal event, Doppler ultrasound, perinatal morbidityAbstract
Introduction: The cerebro-placental ratio results from the division of the pulsatibility index of the umbilical artery and the middle cerebral artery, which is used with greater sensitivity to rule out adverse perinatal event in pregnancies in which comorbidities are known, an attempt is made to describe other uses for this tool due to its easy application. Objectives: To determine the prevalence of an adverse perinatal event in fetuses over 34 weeks with consistent growth in low-risk pregnancies and altered cerebroplacental index in Barranquilla between 2017 and 2019. Methodology: a descriptive cross-sectional study with exploratory analysis of associated factors, 6,607 Dopplers were reviewed, of which 25 had altered cerebro-placental ratio index and that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: 84% of the pregnant women were under 26 years of age, there were no cases of perinatal mortality in this group of patients related to the cerebroplacental index. Only 12% of newborns were admitted to the NICU, and for APGAR less than 7 during the first 5 minutes only 4% of newborns presented it. Conclusions: The cerebro-placental Ratio (CPR) has become an evaluation tool for fetuses at higher risk of growth disorders. Low CPR is associated with adverse neonatal and perinatal outcomes as described in the literature.
Downloads
References
Van den Hof MC. No. 359-Obstetric Ultrasound Biological Effects and Safety. J Obstet Gynaecol Canadá. 2018. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2017.11.023
Laílla Vicens JM, Vela Martínez A. Estudio del bienestar fetal durante el embarazo Concepto de bienestar fetal Captación y transporte por la sangre materna. In: Obstetricia. 2013.
Baschat AA, Gembruch U. The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 21(2):124-7.
Ouyang F, Zhang J, Pilar Betrán A, Yang Z, Paulo Souza J, Merialdi M. La recurrencia de los resultados perinatales adversos en países en desarrollo. Bull WorldHealthOrgan. 2013; 313-388.
Irvine KM, Bligh LN, Kumar S. Association between the fetal cerebroplacental ratio and biomarkers of hypoxia and angiogenesis in the maternal circulation at term. Eur J ObstetGynecolReprod Biol. 2020.
Lees C, Marlow N, Arabin B, Bilardo CM, Brezinka C, Derks JB, et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: Cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). UltrasoundObstetGynecol. 2013; 400 – 408.
Singh T, Leslie K, Bhide A, D’Antonio F, Thilaganathan B. Erratum: Role of second-trimester uterine artery doppler in assessing stillbirth risk Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012; 256-261.
Prior T, Mullins E, Bennett P, Kumar S. Prediction of Fetal Compromise in Labor. ObstetAnesthDig. 2015; 121-126.
Morales-Roselló J, Khalil A, Morlando M, Bhide A, Papageorghiou A, Thilaganathan B. Poor neonatal acid-base status in term fetuses with low cerebroplacental ratio. UltrasoundObstetGynecol. 2015; 156-16.
Baschat AA, Gembruch U. The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 124-127.
Irvine KM, Bligh LN, Kumar S. Association between the fetal cerebroplacental ratio and biomarkers of hypoxia and angiogenesis in the maternal circulation at term. Eur J ObstetGynecolReprod Biol. 2020; 198-204.
Gómez-Sánchez PI, Arévalo-Rodríguez I, Rubio-Romero JA, Guío JA, Osorio-Castaño JH, Buitrago-Gutiérrez G, et al. Guías de práctica clínica para la prevención, detección temprana y tratamiento de las complicaciones del embarazo, parto o puerperio: Introducción y metodología. Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología. 2013.
Sharon Dore, RN, PhD William Ehman, MDNo. 396-Fetal Health Surveillance: Intrapartum Consensus Guideline. Disponible en: DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2019.05.007.
Rei M, Tavares S, Pinto P, Machado AP, Monteiro S, Costa A, et al. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring. Eur J ObstetGynecolReprod Biol. 2016; 27-3.
Curso de monitoria fetal, elaborado y avalado por el CommitteeforSafeMotherhood and NewbornHealth de FIGO, traducido al Español para ser distribuido en América Latina. 2015.
Hawkins J, Bucklin B, Anestesia obstétrica. Obstetricia. Embarazos normales y de riesgo, Capítulo 16, 361-386
Manning FA: Dynamic ultrasound-based fetal assessment: the fetal biophysical profile score. Clin ObstetGynecol 1995; 38: 26-44.
Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Nochimson DJ, and Weinbaum PJ: The use and misuse of the fetal biophysical profile. Am J ObstetGynecol 1987; 527-533.
Morales-Roselló J, Galindo A, Herraiz I, Gil MM, Brik M, De Paco-Matallana C, et al. Is it possible to predict late antepartum stillbirth by means of cerebroplacental ratio and maternal characteristics? J Matern Neonatal Med. 2020.
Morales-Roselló J, Cañada Martínez AJ, Scarinci E, Perales Marín A. Comparison of Cerebro/placental Ratio, Intergrowth-21st Standards, Customized Growth and Local Population References for the Prediction of Fetal Compromise: Which Is the Best Approach? Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019.
Alanwar A, El Nour AA, El Mandooh M, Abdelazim IA, Abbas L, Abbas AM, Abdallah A, Nossair WS, Svetlana S. Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio for adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated with severe pre-eclampsia; a prospective cohort study. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018 Oct;14:86-89. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2018.08.446. Epub 2018 Aug 21. PMID: 30527124.
Asma A. Khalil, et al. Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission? American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Volume 213, Issue 1, 54.e1 - 54.e10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.024
Conde‐Agudelo A. J. Villar S. H. Kennedy A. T. Papageorghiou. Predictive accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio for adverse perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes in suspected fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ultrasonido en Obstetricia y Ginecología / Volume 52, Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19117
Ebbing C, Rasmussen S, Kiserud T. Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and pulsatility index and the cerebroplacental pulsatility ratio: longitudinal reference ranges and terms for serial measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;30(3):287-96. doi: 10.1002/uog.4088. PMID: 17721916.
Kalafat E, Khalil A. Clinical significance of cerebroplacental ratio. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology.2018;30(6):344-54.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Biociencias
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2ab/da2ab4712fe8d3242bd41159e66e17423419d795" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
-
Reconocimiento — Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios<. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.
-
NoComercial — No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial.
-
CompartirIgual — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, deberá difundir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.
- No hay restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que legalmente restrinjan realizar aquello que la licencia permite.