Español
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/2590-6720/ip.1.2022.12196Keywords:
Convencion americana, control de convencionalidad, funcionario de eleccion popular, Proceso disciplinarioAbstract
The objective of this investigative article is to analyze the ruling of Petro Urrego Vs. Colombia of the Inter-American Court regarding the changes that this decision brings to the disciplinary process established in Law 1952 of 2019 and Law 2094 of 2021. In this sense, it is held So, as a problem question, to what extent does the decision of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the Gustavo Petro v. Colombia Case configure a margin of substantial and procedural reform to Law 1952 of 2019? which is developed using the explanatory, descriptive and analytical methodology. Thus, as a result, it was found that in effect the Colombian State had violated the rights of Petro Urrego and thus a modification was required that would comply with the postulates of the American Convention regarding the dismissal and inability of popularly elected officials.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ius Praxis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.